In the world of sports media, few shows have sparked as much debate and criticism as ESPN's "First Take". As the program has grown into a behemoth, its host, Stephen A. Smith, and his co-host, Skip Bayless, have become the focal point of scathing reviews. But what many people fail to realize is that the criticism often extends beyond the show itself, targeting its audience, particularly its large Black viewership. This is where Bomani Jones steps in, offering a unique perspective on the situation.
Jones, a former ESPN employee, argues that the criticism of "First Take" is often a reflection of the critics' own biases and insecurities. He believes that the show has become an easy target for those who feel uncomfortable with its controversial nature and its ability to engage a diverse audience. "Daytime programming at ESPN has always had a huge Black audience," Jones points out. "I bring that up to say, generally speaking, white people don’t really know what to say when they watch something, and they get a signal that it ain’t for them. Black people typically keep on watching. But a lot of those criticisms of First Take, I have always heard in a way and have felt to a degree like they were also, a wee bit, criticisms of the audience."
Jones acknowledges that "First Take" has indeed "earned" its fair share of criticism, but he also argues that Smith and Bayless have earned the popularity that the show enjoyed at its peak. He believes that the show's success lies in its ability to provide a platform for passionate sports fans, regardless of their background or preferences. "There are a lot of people who like that show. There are a lot of people who watched that show," Jones asserts. "There were a lot of topics where when something happened in the news, you were like, ‘Yo, I gotta go see what Skip Bayless has to say about that.’ And a lot of you don’t want to admit that’s how you felt about it. But it’s the truth, and that’s a testament to how good that show could be when those two guys were doing it."
The show's influence is undeniable. Since Bayless' departure from ESPN, "First Take" has evolved into a more relaxed and lighthearted program, reflecting the changing dynamics of the media landscape. Its impact can be seen across various platforms, from Fox News and CNN to local radio shows and sports podcasts. However, Jones reminds us that the show's success should not be measured solely by its ability to provoke controversy. "Two guys who really enjoy each other’s company and really respect each other, arguing with each other about sports, wins," he says.
In conclusion, the criticism of "First Take" is a complex issue that goes beyond the show's content. It reflects a deeper tension between the media's role in shaping public discourse and the diverse preferences and backgrounds of its audience. As Jones suggests, the show's success lies in its ability to provide a platform for passionate sports fans, regardless of their background or preferences. So, the next time you find yourself criticizing "First Take", take a step back and consider the broader implications of your words. After all, in the world of sports media, it's not just about the show, but also about the people who watch it.
