A heart-wrenching tale of homelessness and family support unfolds in Orillia, leaving many questioning the city's actions. Robert Godin, a homeless man with schizophrenia, found refuge in a tiny home built by his son-in-law, Jesse Damery, in the woods to endure the winter. But on Tuesday, the city abruptly demolished the structure, leaving Godin with nowhere to go.
Damery, in a compassionate gesture, constructed the well-insulated home just before Christmas, ensuring Godin didn't have to brave the cold outdoors. Despite knowing the legal implications, he hoped for leniency until the winter passed, as Godin couldn't stay with family or in shared shelters.
The story took a controversial turn when, after gaining media attention, the local police promised support and housing solutions. But on Tuesday, the police and bylaw officers arrived, demanding Godin vacate the premises. When he didn't comply, a taser was drawn, and he was detained. The city claims the taser wasn't used, but the situation raises questions about the handling of vulnerable individuals.
Damery argues that a mental health worker should have been present, given Godin's condition. The city's response? A temporary hotel stay until February 9, leaving Godin's future uncertain. Damery feels they're back to square one, seeking a real solution.
The demolition process was distressing, with Godin's belongings, including food and clothing, thrown into a bin. His daughter managed to save some items, but most were discarded. The city remains tight-lipped about the reasons for the demolition and any complaints received.
The spokesperson's statement about community safety and connecting individuals with housing services raises more questions than it answers. Meanwhile, Damery laments the unnecessary destruction of trees during the demolition, which the city denies.
The outcome? Godin, now without a home, feels defeated, and Damery is exhausted, wondering why a temporary solution couldn't have been allowed. This story highlights the complexities of homelessness and the impact of city policies on vulnerable individuals. But was the city's response justified? Share your thoughts in the comments.
